According to the OECD, the SDGs funding gap, which is the difference between the amount required to achieve the SDGs and the amount currently being invested, has widened to US$4.2 trillion per year.
As actors step in to bridge the funding gap, Economist Impact conducted an extensive literature review and interviews with experts to provide ten key principles of social investment. Mapped across the project life cycle and substantiated with specific examples from the fields of climate, gender, healthcare and livelihoods in APAC countries, these principles can serve as a guide to anyone interested in moving the region towards sustainable development with social investment.
Key sections of the report
Progress towards SDGs and gaps in Asia-Pacific
Challenges and funding gaps
The spectrum of social investment
Ten principles for social investors
Executive summary
Articles
Videos
Countdown to 2030: Progress towards
SDGs and gaps
in Asia-Pacific
This project focuses on 20 countries in Asia-Pacific, home to over 50% of the world population. These include all countries with available data and a population of at least five million in the Asia-Pacific region, with the exception of North Korea (PRK) and Papua New Guinea (PNG). Namely: Afghanistan (AFG), Australia (AUS), Bangladesh (BGD), Cambodia (KHM), China (CHN), India (IND), Indonesia (IDN), Japan (JPN), Korea (KOR), Laos (LAO), Malaysia (MYS), Myanmar (MMR), Nepal (NPL), New Zealand (NZL), Pakistan (PAK), the Philippines (PHL), Singapore (SGP), Sri Lanka (LKA), Thailand (THA) and Vietnam (VNM). Since the establishment of the SDGs in 2015, these countries have made uneven progress across the SDGs.
Asia-Pacifc average SDG Index scores
1 No poverty
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
2 Zero hunger
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
3 Good health and well-being
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
4 Quality education
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
5 Gender equality
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
6 Clean water and sanitation
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
7 Affordable and clean energy
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
8 Decent work and economic growth
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
9 Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
10 Reduced inequalities
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
11 Sustainable cities and communities
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
12 Responsible consumption and production
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
13 Climate action
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
14 Life below water
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
15 Life on land
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
16 Peace, justice and strong institutions
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
17 Partnerships for the goals
Overall achievement
Overall 20 country achivement
Others
KOR
MMR
THA
VNM
PHL
JPN
BGD
PAK
IDN
IND
CHN
2015 Score
Footnote 1: The chart shows all countries with available data and a population of at least five million in the Asia-Pacific region, with the exception of North Korea (PRK) and Papua New Guinea (PNG). These include: Afghanistan (AFG), Australia (AUS), Bangladesh (BGD), Cambodia (KHM), China (CHN), India (IND), Indonesia (IDN), Japan (JPN), Korea (KOR), Laos (LAO), Malaysia (MYS), Myanmar (MMR), Nepal (NPL), New Zealand (NZL), Pakistan (PAK), the Philippines (PHL), Singapore (SGP), Sri Lanka (LKA), Thailand (THA) and Vietnam (VNM).
Footnote 2: Economist Impact produced this chart using data from the Sustainable Development Report 2021 (SDR 2021) database. The SDRs incorporate new evidence as it becomes available, resulting in a constantly evolving basket of indicators that are not directly comparable from one year to the next. However, the Economist Impact analysis aims to create index scores that are comparable across time, which leaves us with a smaller subset of indicators. As a result, the index scores in this chart are not always the same as in the SDRs.

Challenges and funding gaps: Examples from
climate,
gender, healthcare and livelihoods
Climate
A decrease of 0.37 percentage points in the index score of SDG13: Climate action
...was experienced by the 20 countries in Asia-Pacific from 2015 to 2021
16 of the 20 countries saw an increase in per capita CO₂ emissions
...from fossil fuel combustion and cement production from 2015 to 2019, bringing the average up by 0.1 tonnes per capita
A US$23 trillion investment gap remains in the climate sector
...to achieve the SDGs by 2030 in emerging markets in APAC and beyond, according to International Finance Corporation (IFC)
At least seven of the 20 countries will see no improvement in total CO₂ emissions
...from fuel combustion (tonnes per head) from 2021 to 2030, according to a forecast by the Economist Intelligence Unit (the EIU)
Possible decline of 18% in agricultural yields in South Asia by 2050
...the largest of all regions, as estimated by World Development Report 2010
Asia had its warmest year in recorded history in 2020
...and the summer monsoons were unusually active, according to the World Meteorological Organization
4 to 5 million people forced to move due to disasters
...in China, Bangladesh and India respectively in 2020 alone
Gender
SDG5: Gender Equality is among Asia’s weakest SDGs
...Asia-Pacific scored only 46/100 in SDG5 in 2015, 49/100 in 2021
Girls are catching up in 11 of the 16 non-OECD countries
...in the years of education received from 2015 to 2021
Zero progress made in the ratio of female-to-male labour force participation rate
...in Pakistan and China, for example, this ratio decreased every year from 2015 to 2019 (the year of latest available data)
70% of the 1.3 billion people living in poverty are women
...80% of people displaced by climate change are women
45 million women left the labour force in the first year of the pandemic
Food insecurity levels among women were 10% higher than those among men, according to UN Women
Intersectionality of gender with other sectors puts it at the core of sustainable development
Healthcare
Asia-Pacific made progress of 2.3 percentage points in SDG3: Good health and wellbeing
...from 2015 to 2021, much slower than the 2.5 percentage points per year needed to achieve the goal by 2030
Half of the 20 countries scored below the global average in universal health coverage index
...as reported by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2019
Only 15 doctors per 10,000 people in Asia-Pacific
...based on 13 countries data in 2021, according to the EIU. This is lower than the global average (19). In Indonesia, there are fewer than 5
Six Asian countries will have fewer than 20 hospital beds per 10,000 people
...in 2026, according to forecasts by the EIU, while the global average was 30 in 2021
An extra US$371 billion per year is needed to achieve SDG3
...for low- and middle-income countries
Livelihoods
Asia-Pacific suffered a setback in SDG1: No poverty in 2020
...for the first time since 2015
40 million people were pushed into extreme poverty
...defined as living under US$ 1.90 per day, in India, Indonesia, Nepal, Pakistan and the Philippines
Two years’ worth of progress has been lost
...even as most countries have recovered to 2019 levels
Eight countries are now not on track to achieve SDG1 on time
...instead of four in 2019
Unemployment surged in all 16 non-OECD countries in 2020
...progress in SDG8: Decent work and economic growth lost momentum
Unemployment rate will not return to pre-pandemic levels until 2026
...in seven of the 20 countries, according to the EIU
Investments are needed to protect livelihoods
...as the pandemic continues to disrupt economic activities
The spectrum of social investment
“Social investment”, defined in this research as capital that aims to create or amplify social impact alongside potential financial returns, is key to bridging the SDG funding gaps.
Venture philanthropy
Blended finance
Debt
Equity
Equity
Intellectual capital
Introducing the ten principles
for social investors
Based on an extensive literature review and in-depth interviews with a range of experts, Economist Impact provides ten key principles for social investors. Mapped across the life cycle of a project, these are broad, high-level principles that work for investments encompassing the various SDGs, with specific examples from areas of healthcare, gender, livelihoods and climate in Asia.
Key principles across the lifecycle of social investment
Mapped across the life cycle of a project, these are broad, high-level principles that work for investments encompassing the various SDGs, with specific examples from areas of healthcare, gender, livelihood, and climate in Asia.

Pre-investment
Investment planning
Implementation
Completion
Measurement & accountability
Measure impact and take responsibility for it, but do not be driven entirely by meeting arbitrary quantitative standards.
Post-completion
Closure
Ensure responsible handovers/project closure.
Advancing impact
Not all countries in Asia-Pacific are on track to achieve the SDGs and large funding gaps exist. Social investment, defined as capital that aims to create or amplify social impact alongside potential financial returns, is key to bridge these gaps. This document provides ten key principles for social investors based on an extensive literature review and in-depth interviews with experts.
Download full report PDFArticles

Investing in healthcare: Technology as the key to scalable impact
Asia-Pacific is falling behind on progress in the health SDG. Investing in technology can help countries get back on track by creating scalable impact with commercially viable models.
Read article
The climate challenge: Need and models of collaboration in the Asian context
Multifaceted problems arising from climate change are affecting Asia-Pacific disproportionately, and they require collaboration to solve. There are multiple pathways to do so.
Read article
Addressing inclusion in livelihood investments
As the pandemic takes its toll on the economy, inclusion in livelihood investments is more critical than ever.It does not have to come at the expense of financial sustainability, as examples from Asia-Pacific show.
Read article
Intentionality in gender investments
Gender equality calls for investments where benefits for women are not just an unintentional output. Case studies show why Asia-Pacific needs such investments, and how to make the most of them.
Read article
